Auteurs |
Jaar |
Titel |
Damman, Jani, de Jong, Becker, Metz, de Bruijne, Timmermans, Cornel, Ubbink, van der Steen, Gray & van El |
2020 |
The use of PROMs and shared decision‐making in medical encounters with patients: An opportunity to deliver value‐based health care to patients |
Van der Meij, Damman, Uiters & Timmermans |
2019 |
What benefits and harms are important for a decision about cervical screening? A study of the perspective of different subgroups of women |
Damman, de Jong, Hibbard & Timmermans |
2015 |
Making comparative performance more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
Damman, van der Beek & Timmermans |
2015 |
Employees are ambivalent about preventive health checks in the occupational setting |
Damman, van der Beek & Timmermans |
2014 |
Workers' Knowledge and Beliefs About Cardiometabolic Health Risk |
Damman, de Boer, Hendriks, Meuwissen, Rademakers, Delnoij & Groenewegen |
2011 |
Differences between family practices in the associations of patient characteristics with health care experiences |
Damman, van den Hengel, van Loon & Rademakers |
2010 |
An international comparison of web-based reporting about health care quality: content analysis |
Damman, Hendriks, Rademakers, Delnoij & Groenewegen |
2009 |
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews |
Damman, Stubbe, Hendriks, Arah, Spreeuwenberg, Delnoij & Groenewegen |
2009 |
Using multilevel modeling to assess case-mix adjusters in consumer experience surveys in health care |
Damman, Hendriks & Sixma |
2009 |
Towards more patient centred healthcare: A new Consumer Quality Index instrument to assess patients' experiences with breast care |
Damman, Bogaerts, Van Dongen & Timmermans |
2015 |
Barriers in using cardiometabolic risk information among consumers with low health literacy |
Damman, De Jong, Hibbard & Timmermans |
2015 |
Making comparative performance more comprehensible: an experimental evaluation of the impact of formats on consumer understanding |
Hopmans, Damman, Porsius, Zwaan, Senan & Timmermans |
2016 |
Treatment recommendations by clinicians in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A study of factors that influence the likelihood of accounting for the patient’s preference |
Damman, Bogaerts, van den Haak & Timmermans |
2017 |
How lay people understand and make sense of personalized disease risk information |
Hopmans, Zwaan Senan, van der Wulp, Damman, Hartemink, Smit & Timmermans |
2015 |
Differences between pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists in deciding on the treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A binary choice experiment |
Hopmans, Damman, Senan, Hartemink, Smit & Timmermans |
2015 |
A patient perspective on shared decision making in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: A mixed methods study |
Hopmans, Damman, Timmermans, Haasbeek, Slotman & Senan |
2014 |
Communicating cancer treatment information using the Web: utilizing the patient’s perspective in website development |